馬克思主義接管美國的策略10—美國遺產概要65　 

我們持續談到馬克思主義45個目標的第36個目標，其宣稱要用這些目標把美國帶入他們的綑綁之下。

馬克思主義目標#36: 滲入並掌控更多的工會。

馬克思主義者想要掌控更多工會的目標，真相意味著他們已經掌控了一些工會。早在1930年代，就有人擔心，如果美國要對抗史達林主義的俄羅斯，工會可能會關閉交通運輸以提供國防所需的物資。一些人認為我們到今天仍處在如此危險的地位，但真實情況比當時更糟。許多我們的國防材料，甚至是我們核武的電子晶片現在都由共產主義的中國所製造。

當這些馬克思主義摧毀美國的目標首次提出時，絕大多數的工會領袖和成員都是堅定的反馬克思主義者。多數工會成員至今仍如此，毫無疑問，一些工會領袖仍是堅定的反馬克思主義者。即便如此，許多工會已被滲入，甚至有些工會已被馬克思主義間諜所接管，包括一些最強大的工會。

在美國有二個最強大的工會，幾乎完全亦步亦趨跟隨馬克思主義的議程前進，分別是教師工會和公共服務工會。在教師工會的馬克思主義者能將馬克思主義的教導放入公立學校課程，而公共服務工會受到「深層政府」的侵襲，成為我們共和立憲制的立即威脅。深層政府現在強大到能夠執行自己制定的法規作為法律，而無視國會通過的法律和總統的行政命令。

羅斯福總統可能是白宮最親社會主義和工會的首席執行官，但他強烈反對為聯邦僱員成立任何工會，因為這是對我們基本安全的威脅。他當時的決定是正確的，如今非常強大的公共服務工會被視為國家安全的最大威脅。這是如何發生的？此發生是透過在我們政府中選出或任命軟弱天真和不勝任的領導階層。

其他一些工會也對國家安全構成威脅，他們有權關閉所需的國防運輸和高度優先的供應品，如食品和藥品，並可以關閉美國很大區塊的商業活動。這不是在說有工會計畫這麼做，而是聯邦調查局本來是對抗危險的堡壘，現在卻變得如此政治化和武器化，其成員甚至發展計畫來推翻民選總統，正如最近所揭露的真相。那麼，現在是誰在保衛我們？

一些工會對於許多美國勞工擁有更好薪資、福利和工作環境扮演著重要角色；然而，馬克思主義接管工會的目標有其原因，也在一些工會達成。許多公會成員似乎仍是美國愛國主義者，但馬克思主義者對工會的教化並沒有間斷。

馬克思主義目標#37: 滲入並掌控財團。

許多美國人有著很大的誤解，以為共和黨員是向著大財團，而民主黨員則是向著勞工和老百姓。倘若我們不單看言語，而是去看行動和政策，共和黨員為老百姓所做的反而更多，民主黨卻更多向著大財團靠攏。

可悲的是，當左派的政策對一般美國人帶來極大的破壞，美國人卻選擇性相信左派人士說自己是「弱者」（little guy）的言詞。與大眾普遍相信相反的，共和黨和保守黨員為美國老百姓和弱勢所做得更多，但連許多共和黨員都沒有意識到這點。

民主黨總統候選人持續在競選時主張抵制壟斷和財團壓制，上任後卻從來沒有任何挑戰他們的行動。這即是何以壟斷企業和大財團往往會支持民主黨候選人多過共和黨。當年是共和黨的羅斯福總統承擔起鐵路、鋼鐵和能源大壟斷並打破這些壟斷。他還通過了第一條反壟斷法，實現民主黨承諾數十年卻在任期內毫無作為的事情。

近來我們在歐巴馬政府看見民主黨持續向大財團靠攏，在2008年次貸危機之後，儘管是大銀行製造了危機，但當歐巴馬向大銀行靠攏，小型社區銀行幾乎完全無法生存。歐巴馬宣稱這樣做是為著百姓的益處，但完全行不通。為什麼呢？

正如馬克思主義的宣傳與其應用剛好相反，民主黨的言詞在上任後常與所作所為相反。這不是在說許多共和黨員做得就比較好，而是民主黨的真實作為與政策壓倒性向著大財團靠攏，儘管他們所宣稱的剛好相反。共和黨才是唯一成功挑戰大財團弊端，政策持續協助中小企業和一般老百姓。

就本質而論，左派是在強化中央集權，在少數人手中積累權力和財富。這對馬克思主義很重要，隨著馬克思主義的影響在民主黨升高，他們越來越多提倡大政府、大財團和大銀行。

卡特政府曾暗示小型企業只佔美國整體經濟的百分之六，當這些企業受到挑戰，決定做一份研究報告看看小型企業有多少市佔率。出乎他們意料，事實上是出乎所有人意料，他們發現小型企業組合至少佔美國整體經濟五成。在這份報告中，小型企業被定義為員工人數在25人以下的企業。如果他們使用一般所認為小型企業員工人數是50人的數據，小型企業所組成的經濟市佔率遠高過整體經濟的五成。

反而是大財團對整體經濟的貢獻很小，在此研究中得知，大約有七成五到八成的新工作是由這些小型企業所提供的。再一次，如果他們使用50人來定義小型企業，經濟市佔率可能會達到九成甚至更高。

在歐巴馬政府時期，美國經濟成長減緩至一年不到百分之一。歐巴馬說那是「新的基準」，我們應當期待未來都會如此。毫無疑問，如果民主黨繼續執政，他們的政策如此損害小型企業，未來真的會如此。當川普說美國經濟會達到百分之五的年成長率，充斥的譏笑和輕蔑，直到川普政府只執政二年就達到此目標。因為他的政治幫助了「弱者」，每個種族和經濟次營商的失業率，也急劇下降到歐巴馬告訴我們再也不用期待的水平。

倘若我們要逃脫馬克思主義接管我們國家的威脅，我們必須認識到馬克思主義者/左派人士的宣傳與他們的訴求相反。還記得當歐巴馬總統說聯邦政府絕不會介入汽車產業，當天下午就奪取通用汽車的控制權？還記得他說在他推行的平價醫療法案下，健保費用會下降，諸如此類的事情我們可以一直說下去，包括目前的政策，醫生等等，真正的結果剛好相反。我們還可以繼續談到許多其他例子，他們所說的結果和我們所得到的正好相法。一個更重要的問題是，我們要多久才能從中醒悟過來？

～摘錄美國政治諷刺家和記者─歐魯克（P.J. O’Rourke）～

不是毒品更不是酒精造成這個社會的基本弊病。如果我們去尋找問題的根源，我們不應去撿測毒品，反倒應該檢測人們的愚蠢、無知、貪婪和對權力的熱愛。 

～摘錄未知名人士（Unknown）～

左派人士極度擔心某人可能在某處感到快樂。 

 (摘自喬納Heritage Briefs 65, 2021)

 

The Marxist Strategy for Taking Over America , Part 10— Heritage Brief 65 

  We continue covering the 45 Goals Marxists declared for bringing America under their bondage with Goal #36:

MARXIST GOAL #36: Infiltrate and gain control of more unions. 

         The fact that this goal was to gain control of “more” unions implies that they already had control of some. As early as the 1930s there was concern that if America took sides against Stalinist Russia, unions could shut down transportation for the supplies needed for our defense. Some think that we remain in such a precarious place today, but it is much worse than that. Many of our defense materials, even the electronic chips in our nuclear weapons, are now manufactured in Communist China. 

         When these Marxist goals for destroying America were first formulated, the great majority of union leaders and members were staunch anti-Marxists. Most union members still are, and no doubt there are some union leaders who are staunch anti-Marxists. Even so, many unions, including some of the most powerful, have been infiltrated, and in some cases taken over by Marxist operatives.

         Two of the most powerful unions in America that have moved in almost total lockstep with the Marxist agenda are the Teachers’ Unions and the Public Service Unions. Marxists in the Teachers’ Unions have been able to insert Marxist indoctrination into public school curriculums. The Public Service Unions have been the inroads of the “deep state” that is an immediate threat to our Constitutional Republic. They are now so powerful they are able to implement regulations of their own making as laws, and to ignore laws passed by Congress and Executive Orders from the President.

         President Franklin D. Roosevelt was perhaps the most socialist and pro-union chief executive to occupy the White House, but he was vehemently against any unions being formed for federal employees as a threat to our basic security. He was right, and the now very powerful Public Service Unions are considered one of the greatest threats to the security of our country. How did this happen? It happened by the election of, or appointment of, weak, naïve, inept leadership in our government.   

         There are other unions that are security threats to the country by being in a position to shut down needed shipping of defense and high priority supplies such as food and medicine, as well as a huge part of all commerce in America. This is not to say that any of these unions are now planning for this. But the FBI has been a bulwark against dangers now so politicized and weaponized that members have even developed plans to overthrow a duly elected President, such as recent revelations have exposed. So who is now guarding us?

         Some unions have had a major part in bettering the wages, benefits, and working conditions for many American workers. However, this Marxist goal of taking over unions was for a reason, and it has been achieved in some unions. It seems that many union members remain patriotic Americans, but the indoctrination of union workers by Marxists continues.

MARXIST GOAL #37: Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

         A great misunderstanding many Americans have is that Republicans are for big business, and Democrats are for the workers and common people. If we look at actions and policies, and not just rhetoric, the Republicans have done far more for the common people, while the Democrats have sided far more with big business. 

         Tragically, Americans have been conditioned to believe propaganda even when facts prove it is not true. They have believed the rhetoric of the leftists to be for the “little guy” when their policies have been devastating to average Americans. Contrary to popular belief, Republicans and conservatives have done far more for average and disadvantaged Americans, but many Republicans do not even understand this.

         Democratic candidates for President have continually run on a platform of being against the oppression of the monopolies and big business, but have done nothing to challenge them when in office. This is why monopolies and big business usually support Democratic candidates over the Republicans. It was the Republican President Teddy Roosevelt who took on the big railroad, steel, and energy monopolies and broke them up. He also passed the first anti-trust laws, accomplishing what the Democrats had promised for decades, but had done nothing about when in office.

         We see this siding with big business continuing as recently as the Obama-Biden Administrations. Small community banks were almost entirely destroyed when Obama sided with big banks after the 2008 sub-prime crisis, even though it was the big banks that had created the crisis. Obama claimed to be doing all that he did for the good of the people, but it never worked out that way. Why?

         Just as Marxist propaganda is the opposite of Marxism applied, the rhetoric of the Democratic Party has often been the opposite of their practice when in power. This is not to say that many Republicans haven’t done much of the same, but the actual practices and policies of the Democratic Party overwhelming sides with big business though they claim the opposite. The only ones who have successfully challenged the abuses of big business, and whose policies consistently aid small business and average Americans, are the Republicans.

         By nature, the left is for consolidation that leads to centralization, accumulating power and wealth in the hands of a few. That is essential to Marxism, and as the influence of Marxism has grown in the Democratic Party they increasingly promote big government, big business, and big banks.

         The Carter Administration once implied that small business only made up about 6% of the American economy. When challenged, they decided to do a study to determine just how much of a part it was. To their shock, and virtually everyone else’s, they found out that small businesses composed at least 50% of the economy. A small business in this study was defined as having twenty-five employees or less. If they had used what is generally thought of as a small business, having fifty employees or less, this percentage of the economy that was composed of small businesses would have been far higher.

         It is big business that actually makes up a small percentage of the whole economy. In this study it was also learned that 75% to 80% of all new jobs were created by these small businesses. Again, if they had used a definition of fifty employees or less for a small business this could have been 90% or even higher.

         During the Obama Administration growth in the American economy slowed to less than 1% a year. Obama said that this was “the new norm” that we should expect in the future. That would no doubt have been true if the Democrats had stayed in power as their policies were so damaging to small businesses. There was laughter and scorn when Trump said the economy could reach a 5% annual growth, until it did in just two years under his Administration. Because his policies actually helped the “little guy,” the unemployment of every racial and economic sub-group also fell dramatically to levels we had been told by Obama never to expect again.

         If we are going to escape the threatened Marxist takeover of our country, we must learn that Marxist, leftist propaganda is the opposite of their intent. Remember when President Obama said that the federal government would never go into the automobile business, and then seized control of General Motors the same afternoon? Remember when he said that under The Affordable Health Care Act the cost of health insurance would go down, we could keep our present policies, doctors, etc., and the actual result was the opposite? We could go on to many other examples of what they say actually turning out to be the opposite of what we get. A more important question is how long will it take for us to wake up to what has been done to us?

No drug, not even alcohol, causes the fundamental ills of society. If we’re looking for the source of our troubles, we shouldn’t test people for drugs, we should test them for stupidity, ignorance, greed, and love of power. – P.J. O’Rourke

The left has the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy. — Unknown